The
way I see it, this site is as much yours as it is mine. So, what
shall we
do with it? I think it is time to reassess the role of
this site. Should it significantly change? Should it go away? I
am totally open.
<Part
of this re-examination involves me losing my old, mustache-less,
image
and replacing it
with a
recent
photo.
My 12
year old son, and image consultant, insisted upon this.>
Well,
maybe in order to answer the above question we should review where
edtechnot.com came
from, and what it has done, and then you can
start contacting me with ideas.
This
web site was created as a reaction to the overt commercialism of
the field of educational technology. I know that stuff costs money.
I also know that there are tons of great hardware and software
solutions that are making a difference in schools. (Don't write
to me about this.) I also know that some heavily marketed "solutions"
are a waste of time and money. They are simply educationally unsound.
My statement from March of 2001 was:
I hope
that this site will be a refreshing change from the corporate "rah-rah" associated
with each new product launch.
It
is also hoped that it will encourage those who are feeling
battered by the increasingly
trendy "techno-phobic" side of the issue.
...and I still
stand by this.
My
vision was of a teacher, parent or graduate student who was looking
for information
about educational technology
and coming across my web site to encounter some unfiltered
ideas. They may even read opposing views and make their own informed
decisions
about the use of ed tech. Simple.
Although
the site has been mischaracterized as a neo-luddite resource, my
bias,
as a long time tech user and
tech teacher, is pro-technology. I ran hypercard, internet and
mindstorms clubs at my school. I did many staff development sessions
on the topic and created this site out of respect for the intelligence
and energy of those associated with this field.
Historically,
the impetus (translation, kick in the pants) to create the site
really came over dinner with Ian Jukes in Stamford, CT in the winter
of
2001.
He
essentially
said,
"stop whining and make the site". So I did.
So,
is this site still necessary? Is it helping anyone? Could a few
minor changes to it drastically improve it? (as described in Gladwell's
Tipping Points) I really need some feedback from you and
am hoping that you might take a few minutes to respond or have
your undergrad or grad students respond.
Anything I learn I will
share with our readers in our next update. (Hopefully, next month
with
a feature
from
Ian Jukes.)
It really has been a cool
ride that has allowed me to interact with many interesting people...but
maybe it is time to move on?
E-mail
me with your reaction.
All the best!
Jim :-)